For current students, the June 2017 ACCN4 mark scheme is a cheat sheet for exam technique. It teaches three vital lessons:
If a student’s answer is unclear but seems correct, examiner awards mark if "BOD" is indicated. ib g jun17 accn4 mark scheme
The mark scheme is not just "correct answers" – it’s a guide for examiners. Key features: For current students, the June 2017 ACCN4 mark
The ACCN4 paper, often associated with the deeper theoretical and engagement components of the Global Politics course, requires a sophisticated level of analysis. The June 2017 mark scheme reveals that examiners were looking for more than rote memorization of case studies. Key features: The ACCN4 paper, often associated with
A close reading of the scheme highlights a distinct shift toward synthesis. In the "Levels" descriptors, the difference between a mid-range Level 3 and a high-flying Level 5 often came down to the "quality of the argument." The June 2017 scheme explicitly penalized descriptive writing—students who merely listed facts about sovereignty or human rights without weaving them into a coherent argument found themselves hitting a glass ceiling.
Key Insight: The scheme frequently used phrases like "evaluates the claim" or "synthesizes competing perspectives." This signaled to teachers that the IB was moving away from binary "right/wrong" answers and toward rewarding students who could navigate political grey areas.