Indian Village Aunty Pissing Outside New Hidden Camera Link Info
Here is a question most users don't ask when they buy a $50 camera: Do you own your data, or does the company?
Read the Terms of Service (if you dare). Many doorbell camera companies retain the right to use your footage for training their AI models. You may be "teaching" their algorithms to recognize faces or cars for free. Furthermore, law enforcement agencies have increasingly partnered with home camera manufacturers (most notably Ring’s "Neighbors" app) to request footage from users without a warrant.
In many jurisdictions, police cannot force you to hand over footage without a warrant. But manufacturers can ask for your permission. Through push notifications like "Help police identify a suspect near your home," companies put the onus on you, the homeowner, to decide whether to become an extension of the state surveillance apparatus. indian village aunty pissing outside new hidden camera link
Privacy advocates have three major concerns with the rise of DIY security systems:
1. The "Digital Panopticon" on Your Street Just because a sidewalk is public doesn't mean your neighbor consents to being recorded every time they take out the trash. When cameras blanket a street, it changes social behavior. People stop lingering. They stop chatting over the fence. They retreat indoors. Here is a question most users don't ask
2. Data Leaks and Hacks That camera pointed at your backyard might be secure. But is the cloud server it uploads to? We’ve all read the headlines about hacked baby monitors or security feeds ending up on random websites. Your neighbor’s privacy isn’t just at risk from you—it’s at risk from your device’s weak password.
3. The Audio Issue Most people don’t realize that recording audio without consent is often illegal, even if video is fine. That camera on your porch might be capturing your neighbor’s private conversation on their own porch two feet away. You may be "teaching" their algorithms to recognize
Courts generally rule that if a person has a "reasonable expectation of privacy," you cannot record them. This includes:
Hello Thom
Serenity System and later Mensys owned eComStation and had an OEM agreement with IBM.
Arca Noae has the ownership of ArcaOS and signed a different OEM agreement with IBM. Both products (ArcaOS and eComStation) are not related in terms of legal relationship with IBM as far as I know.
For what it had been talked informally at events like Warpstock, neither Mensys or Arca Noae had access to OS/2 source code from IBM. They had access to the normal IBM products of that time that provided some source code for drivers like the IBM Device Driver Kit.
The agreements with IBM are confidential between the companies, but what Arca Noae had told us, is that they have permission from IBM to change the binaries of some OS/2 components, like the kernel, in case of being needed. The level of detail or any exceptions to this are unknown to the public because of the private agreements.
But there is also not rule against fully replacing official IBM binaries of the OS with custom made alternatives, there was not a limitation on the OS/2 days and it was not a limitation with eComStation on it’s days.
Regards
4gb max ram WITH PAE! nah sorry a few frames would that ra mu like crazy. i am better off using 64x_hauku, linux or BSD.
> a few frames would that ra mu like crazy
I am not sure what you were trying to say. I can’t untangle that.
This is a 32-bit OS that aside from a few of its own 32-bit binaries mainly runs 16-bit DOS and Win16 ones.
There are a few Linux ports, but they are mostly CLI tools (e.g. `yum`). They don’t need much RAM either.
4GB is a lot. I reviewed ArcaOS and lack of RAM was not a problem.
Saying that, I’d love in-kernel PAE support for lots of apps with 2GB each. That would probably do everything I ever needed.