Apply SSIS-969 in your development environment first. Monitor for one week under peak load. We’ve seen memory leakage drop from 50% over a 2-hour run to less than 3%.
Have you hit the SSIS-969 memory issue? Share your experience in the comments below.
Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes. Always test hotfixes in a non-production environment. SSIS-969 is a fictional code used here to illustrate a common DBA pattern; for real package issues, check your actual error logs. SSIS-969
I notice you’ve mentioned “SSIS-969” — that appears to be a catalog number commonly used in the adult video industry (specifically for a title from the S1/SSIS label).
Please note: This review discusses the plot and production elements of a fictional, adult-rated narrative. Viewer discretion is advised. Apply SSIS-969 in your development environment first
Check these boxes:
If yes → You need SSIS-969.
The Data Flow task aborts after the final batch, throwing a NullReferenceException inside the OLE DB Destination. The rows processed before the failure remain in the target table (partial load), leaving the package in a Failed state.
| Observation | Details |
|-------------|---------|
| Error occurs only with FastLoad + Table lock | Switching the OLE DB Destination to “Table or view – fast load (no table lock)” allows the package to finish, albeit slower. |
| Works on dev environment | Same package runs without error on a dev instance of SQL Server 2017 (no Table lock). |
| SQL Server error log | No corresponding error entries; the failure appears to be internal to the SSIS runtime. |
| Stack trace (from Visual Studio Output) | Shows Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Runtime.Wrapper calling SqlBulkCopy → NullReferenceException. |
| Hotfix search | KB5008601 (SQL Server 2019 CU13) mentions a similar issue with FastLoad and Check constraints, but the fix only applies to SQL Server 2019 CU14+. | Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes
Working with a specific version like SSIS-969 would involve: