Between 1999 and 2005, carriers used WAP gateways with numerical IDs. A legitimate WAP URL looked like:
http://wap.myoperator.com/95/
Scammers simply replaced the dots with hyphens (www-wap-95-com) to bypass early text-based filters while looking "official" to untrained eyes.
When a user typed a URL into a WAP browser (e.g., http://www.example.com), the request first went to a WAP gateway. This gateway:
In the context of WWW-WAP-95-COM, a portal from that era would have been a .COM domain (registered between 1995 and 1998) specifically optimized to serve both HTML for desktop users and WML for early mobile users. WWW-WAP-95-COM
Below is a reference architecture that illustrates how the three technologies were stitched together in prototype implementations and early commercial products (e.g., Microsoft Pocket Internet Explorer, Nokia’s early WAP browsers on Windows CE devices, and IBM’s WebSphere Mobile Server).
Imagine accessing a “WWW-WAP-95-COM” portal on a Nokia 9000 Communicator (1996) or a Motorola StarTAC (1996): Between 1999 and 2005, carriers used WAP gateways
Sites with “95” in their branding often had primitive animations (ASCII art or simple splash screens) and heavy reliance on numeric shortcuts.
In almost all modern cases, encountering this string means: In the context of WWW-WAP-95-COM , a portal
Verdict: Do not visit it. It is not a legitimate mobile carrier or service provider.